Revisiting "yes/no" versus "check all that apply": Results from a mixed modes experiment
Keywords: survey methods, mode of data collection, questionnaire design, check all that apply, forced choice
AbstractThe work of Smyth, Dillman, Christian, and Stern (2006) and Smyth, Christian, and Dillman (2008) compares “yes/no” questions to “check all that apply” questions. They conclude that the “yes/no” format is preferable as it reflects deeper processing of survey questions. Smyth et al. (2008) found that the “yes/no” format performed similarly across telephone and web modes. In this paper we replicate their research and extend it by including a comparison with face-to-face in addition to telephone and web and by using probability samples of the general adult population. A cognitive interviewing follow-up was used to explore the quantitative findings. Our results suggest there are times when the “yes/no” format may not perform similarly across modes and that there may be factors which limit the quality of answers.
How to Cite
Nicolaas, G., Campanelli, P., Hope, S., Jäckle, A., & Lynn, P. (2015). Revisiting "yes/no" versus "check all that apply": Results from a mixed modes experiment. Survey Research Methods, 9(3), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i3.6151
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in the journal but only for non-commercial purposes and with proper attribution.