Revisiting "yes/no" versus "check all that apply": Results from a mixed modes experiment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i3.6151

Keywords:

survey methods, mode of data collection, questionnaire design, check all that apply, forced choice

Abstract

The work of Smyth, Dillman, Christian, and Stern (2006) and Smyth, Christian, and Dillman (2008) compares “yes/no” questions to “check all that apply” questions. They conclude that the “yes/no” format is preferable as it reflects deeper processing of survey questions. Smyth et al. (2008) found that the “yes/no” format performed similarly across telephone and web modes. In this paper we replicate their research and extend it by including a comparison with face-to-face in addition to telephone and web and by using probability samples of the general adult population. A cognitive interviewing follow-up was used to explore the quantitative findings. Our results suggest there are times when the “yes/no” format may not perform similarly across modes and that there may be factors which limit the quality of answers.

Author Biographies

  • Gerry Nicolaas, Ipsos MORI
    Head of Data Collection Methodology, Research Methods Centre, Social Research Institute, Ipsos MORI
  • Pamela Campanelli, The Survey Coach
    Independent Survey Methods Trainer and Consultant, The Survey Coach
  • Steven Hope, University College London
    Senior Research Associate, Institute of Child Health, University College London
  • Annette Jäckle, University of Essex
    Senior Research Fellow and Associate Director of Innovations for Understanding Society, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex
  • Peter Lynn, University of Essex
    Professor of Survey Methodology, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex

Downloads

Published

2015-12-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Revisiting "yes/no" versus "check all that apply": Results from a mixed modes experiment. (2015). Survey Research Methods, 9(3), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i3.6151

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>