This is an outdated version published on 2024-04-16. Read the most recent version.

Learning through failures

Authors

Lena Hipp WZB Social Science Research Center Berlin and University of Potsdam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1535-8748
Sebastian E. Wenz GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2024.v18i1.8385

Keywords:

survey experiments, factorial surveys, vignette studies, Conjoint Analysis, null-findings, pre-registration, experimental design, sample size requirements

Abstract

Survey Research Methods plans to publish a special issue with research papers and essays about learning through failures. This is the corresponding call for papers for this special issue.

Downloads

HTML

Published

2024-04-16 — Updated on 2024-04-16

Versions

How to Cite

Hipp, L., & Wenz, S. (2024). Learning through failures. Survey Research Methods, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2024.v18i1.8385

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Call for papers

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Lena Hipp , Sebastian E. Wenz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Lena Hipp, Mareike Bünning, Stefan Munnes, Armin Sauermann, Problems and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions in COVID-19 studies , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 14 No. 2 (2020): Survey Research Methods During the COVID-19 Crisis

Similar Articles

Jorre Vannieuwenhuyze, On the Relative Advantage of Mixed-Mode versus Single-Mode Surveys , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2014)
Eliud Kibuchi, Gabriele B Durrant , Olga Maslovskaya, Patrick Sturgis, An Assessment of the Utility of a Bayesian Framework to Improve Response Propensity Models in Longitudinal Data , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024)
Johannes Kappelhof, The effect of different survey designs on nonresponse in surveys among non-Western minorities in The Netherlands. , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 8 No. 2 (2014)
Sandra Walzenbach, Hiding Sensitive Topics by Design? An Experiment on the Reduction of Social Desirability Bias in Factorial Surveys , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 13 No. 1 (2019)
Francesco Sarracino, Cesare Fabio Antonio Riillo, Malgorzata Mikucka, Comparability of web and telephone survey modes for the measurement of subjective well-being , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 11 No. 2 (2017)
Stephen France, Frank G. Adams, V. Myles Landers, Worst Case Resistance Testing: A Nonresponse Bias Solution for Today’s Survey Research Realities , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024)
Carina Cornesse, Michael Bosnjak, Is there an association between survey characteristics and representativeness? A meta-analysis , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018)
Peter Lynn, From standardised to targeted survey procedures for tackling non-response and attrition , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2017)
Annette Jäckle, Peter Lynn, Jon Burton, Going Online with a Face-to-Face Household Panel: Effects of a Mixed Mode Design on Item and Unit Non-Response , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2015)
Matthias Bluemke, Bernd Resch, Clemens Lechner, René Westerholt, Jan-Philipp Kolb, Integrating Geographic Information into Survey Research: Current Applications, Challenges and Future Avenues , Survey Research Methods: Vol. 11 No. 3 (2017): Special Issue: Uses of Geographic Information Systems Tools in Survey Data Collection and Analysis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.