Search

Search Results

• Measuring the Effect of Questionnaire Design on Rating Responses With the Class of CUB Models

  Stefania Capecchi, Romina Gambacorta, Rosaria Simone, Domenico Piccolo

  59-79

  2026-04-10

• Addressing Answer Consistency of Residents in Residential Homes: Experiences From a Mixed Methods Study

  Marie-Kristin Döbler, Katrin Drasch

  43-58

  2026-04-10

• Smartphones vs PCs: Does the Device Affect the Web Survey Experience and the Measurement Error for Sensitive Topics? - A Replication of the Mavletova & Couper’s 2013 Experiment

  Daniele Toninelli, Melanie Revilla

  153-169

  2016-08-15

• Trust, Concerns and Attitudes: Examples for Respondent (Non-)Cooperation in SHARE

  Imke Herold, Michael Bergmann, Arne Bethmann

  295-305

  2025-10-15

• Measurement invariance and quality of composite scores in a face-to-face and a web survey

  Melanie A. Revilla

  17-28

  2012-12-30

• Memory Gaps in the American Time Use Survey. Are Respondents Forgetful or is There More to it?

  Antje Kirchner, Robert F Belli, Ana Lucía Córdova-Cazar, Caitlin E Deal

  231-245

  2018-12-10

• An Evaluation of Incentive Experiments in a Two-Phase Address-Based Sample Mail Survey

  Daifeng Han, Jill M. Montaquila, J. Michael Brick

  207-218

  2013-12-10

• From Strangers to Acquaintances? Interviewer Continuity and Socially Desirable Responses in Panel Surveys

  Simon Kühne

  121-146

  2018-08-13

• Dependent Interviewing and Sub-Optimal Responding

  Johannes Eggs, Annette Jäckle

  15-29

  2015-02-20

• Going Online with a Face-to-Face Household Panel: Effects of a Mixed Mode Design on Item and Unit Non-Response

  Annette Jäckle, Peter Lynn, Jon Burton

  57-70

  2015-04-10

• Survey Breakoffs in a Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview

  Katherine A. McGonagle

  79-90

  2013-06-30

• Internet Surveys: Can Statistical Adjustments Eliminate Coverage Bias?

  Jill A Dever, Ann Rafferty, Richard Valliant

  47-60

  2008-06-29

• Impact of mixed modes on measurement errors and estimates of change in panel data

  Alexandru Cernat

  83-99

  2015-07-31

• Undercoverage and Nonresponse in a List-sampled Telephone Election Survey

  Oliver Lipps, Nicolas Pekari, Caroline Roberts

  71-82

  2015-07-31

• The effect of events between waves on panel attrition

  Mark Trappmann, Tobias Gramlich, Alexander Mosthaf

  31-43

  2015-04-10

• Heaping at Round Numbers on Financial Questions: The Role of Satisficing

  Michael Gideon, Joanne Hsu, Brooke Helppie-McFall

  189-214

  2017-08-07

• Helping Respondents Provide Good Answers in Web Surveys

  Mick Couper, Chan Zhang

  49-64

  2016-04-11

• Are Final Comments in Web Survey Panels Associated with Next-Wave Attrition?

  Cynthia McLauchlan, Matthias Schonlau

  211-224

  2016-12-10

• Switching a Face-to-Face Panel to Self-Administered Survey Modes: Experimental Evidence on Effects of Mode Assignment on Response and Selectivity

  Jette Schröder, Claudia Schmiedeberg, Josef Brüderl, Christiane Bozoyan

  1-11

  2025-05-12

• Speeding in Web Surveys: The tendency to answer very fast and its association with straightlining

  Chan Zhang, Frederick Conrad

  127-135

  2014-07-23

• Tackling city-regional dynamics into a survey using grid sampling

  Seppo Laaksonen, Teemu Kemppainen, Matti Kortteinen, Mats Stjernberg, Mari Vaattovaara, Henrik Lönnqvist

  45-55

  2015-04-10

• Differential response rates in postal and Web-based surveys in older respondents

  Mickael Bech, Morten Bo Kristensen

  1-6

  2009-03-30

• Survey Non-Response Procedures in Cross-National Perspective: The 2005 ISSP Non-Response Survey

  Tom W. Smith

  45-54

• Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: An Experimental Evaluation of Different Implementations of the Randomized Response Technique and the Crosswise Model

  Marc Höglinger, Ben Jann, Andreas Diekmann

  171-187

  2016-12-10

• Item Sum Double-List Technique: An Enhanced Design for Asking Quantitative Sensitive Questions

  Ivar Krumpal, Ben Jann, Martin Korndörfer, Stefan Schmukle

  91-102

  2018-08-13

• Imputation of Housing Rents for Owners Using Models With Heckman Correction

  Beat Hulliger, Gordon Wiegand

  95-103

  2012-07-11

• Evaluation of weighting methods to integrate a top-up sample with an ongoing longitudinal sample

  Nicole Watson

  195-208

  2014-12-10

• The Mobile-only Population in Portugal and Its Impact in a Dual Frame Telephone Survey

  Paula Vicente, Elizabeth Reis

  105-111

  2009-06-27

• Advance letters as a way of reducing non-response in a National Health Telephone Survey: Differences between listed and unlisted numbers

  Elena von der Lippe, Patrick Schmich, Cornelia Lange

  103-116

  2011-12-22

• Challenges and Benefits of Including the Institutionalized, Cognitively Impaired and Unable to Respond in a Representative Survey of the Very Old

  Roman Kaspar, Thomas Brijoux, Andrea Albrecht, Jaroslava Zimmermann, Judith Wenner, Jonas Fey, Marcella Reissmann, Michael Wagner, Susanne Zank

  111-129

  2023-08-08