Measurement Error in Retrospective Work Histories

Authors

  • Jose Pina Sánchez University of Manchester
  • Johan Koskinen University of Manchester
  • Ian Plewis University of Manchester

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2014.v8i1.5144

Keywords:

Measurement error, survey, retrospective design, work history, administrative data

Abstract

Measurement error in retrospective reports of work status has been difficult to quantify in the past. Issues of confidentiality have made access to datasets linking survey responses to a valid administrative source very problematic. This study uses a Swedish register of unemployment as a benchmark against which responses from two survey questions are compared and hence the presence of measurement error elucidated. We carry out separate analyses for the different forms that measurement error in retrospective reports of unemployment can take: miscounting of the number of spells of unemployment, mismeasuring duration in unemployment, and misdating starts of spells and misclassification of status. The prevalence of measurement error for different social categories and interview formats is also examined, leading to a better understanding of the error-generating mechanisms that interact when interviewees are asked to produce retrospective reports of past work status.

Author Biographies

Jose Pina Sánchez, University of Manchester

Social Statistics PhD Student

Johan Koskinen, University of Manchester

Social Statistics Lecturer

Ian Plewis, University of Manchester

Social Statistics Professor

Downloads

Published

2014-03-28

How to Cite

Pina Sánchez, J., Koskinen, J., & Plewis, I. (2014). Measurement Error in Retrospective Work Histories. Survey Research Methods, 8(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2014.v8i1.5144

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.