'Czech' the alternatives: A probe recognition study of focus and word order
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2023.v27.1075Abstract
Comprehenders have been found to activate, select, and represent plausible alternatives to focused elements when processing incoming sentences (see Gotzner & Spalek, 2019 for an overview). This is consistent with Rooth’s (1992) theory of focus interpretation, which claims that the function of focus is to create an additional level of meaning consisting of a set of propositions derived by replacing the focused element with its contextually appropriate alternatives of the same semantic type. However, the psycholinguistic research on the processing of focus has mostly been done on a small sample of Germanic languages which mostly use prosody to mark focus. We tested whether the current results generalise to Czech, which can use word order to mark narrow focus. We report on a probe recognition study aiming to test whether Czech comprehenders represent alternatives to focused subjects. The results provide preliminary evidence in favour of this claim.Downloads
Published
2023-11-30
How to Cite
Lacina, R., Šimík, R., & Gotzner, N. (2023). ’Czech’ the alternatives: A probe recognition study of focus and word order. Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung, 27, 365–380. https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2023.v27.1075
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Radim Lacina, Radek Šimík, Nicole Gotzner
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/