Constraining alternatives

Authors

  • Aron Hirsch
  • Bernhard Schwarz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2024.v29.1240

Abstract

The focus operator only asserts that alternatives to its prejacent are false. But, what alternatives does only exclude? There must be constraints on alternatives. Fox and Katzir (2011) propose that alternatives are formed in the syntax, and are constrained by grammar such that they cannot be structurally more complex than the prejacent. We argue that this constraint is too restrictive. We take a new look at complex alternatives, and conclude that they can be attested, with their distribution regulated pragmatically by the Question Under Discussion (after Roberts 1996/2012, Beaver & Clark 2008, Katzir 2023).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-22

How to Cite

Hirsch, A., & Schwarz, B. (2025). Constraining alternatives. Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung, 29, 710–726. https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2024.v29.1240

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>