Responsive predicates are question-embedding: Evidence from Estonian
AbstractThe proper semantic treatment of the complements of Responsive Predicates (ResPs), those predicates which may embed either declarative or interrogative clauses, is a longstanding puzzle, given standard assumptions about complement selection. In order to avoid positing systematic polysemy for ResPs, typical treatments of ResP complements treat their arguments either as uniformly declarative-like (propositional) or interrogative-like (question). I shed new light on this question with novel data from Estonian, in which there are verbs think-like meanings with declarative complements and wonder-like meanings with interrogative complements. I argue that these verbs’ meaning is fundamentally incompatible with a proposition-taking semantics for ResPs, and therefore a question-taking semantics is to be preferred.
How to Cite
Roberts, T. (2019). Responsive predicates are question-embedding: Evidence from Estonian. Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung, 22(2), 271-288. Retrieved from https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/sub/index.php/sub/article/view/106
Copyright (c) 2019 Tom Roberts
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/